Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39498307›Full record

ReviewiScience2024

Climate model large ensembles as test beds for applied compound event research.

Flavio Lehner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Flavio LehnerDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some of the most impactful climate and weather events result from compounding drivers. To robustly assess the current and future risk from such compound events, a better understanding of the associated sources of uncertainty is needed. Internal variability confounds detection and attribution of human-induced climate change and imposes irreducible limits on the accuracy of climate projections. Response uncertainty can lead to divergent projections for many societally important quantities such as precipitation. Combined with unknown future greenhouse gas emissions, these uncertainties can result in a socio-economically paralyzing range of future storylines. Climate model large ensembles are uniquely positioned to assess these uncertainties and are rightfully gaining popularity in compound event research, but they need to be accompanied by rigorous model validation and robust observational constraints to reach their full potential in terms of usefulness for practitioners. This perspective discusses these opportunities and challenges at the example of water resources and provides an outlook on application-oriented compound event research with large ensembles.

Indexed as

Atmosphere modellingClimatologyEarth sciences

Identifiers

PMID39498307
PMCPMC11532948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.