Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39498292›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Applying stacking ensemble method to predict chronic kidney disease progression in Chinese population based on laboratory information system: a retrospective study.

Jialin Du, Jie Gao, Jie Guan, Bo Jin, Nan Duan, Lu Pang, Haiming Huang, Qian Ma, Chenwei Huang, Haixia Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jialin DuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jie GaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Jie GuanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Bo JinDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Nan DuanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lu PangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Haiming HuangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qian MaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chenwei HuangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Haixia LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health issue, and accurate prediction of the progression of kidney failure is critical for clinical decision-making and helps improve patient outcomes. As such, we aimed to develop and externally validate a machine-learned model to predict the progression of CKD using common laboratory variables, demographic characteristics, and an electronic health records database. Methods: We developed a predictive model using longitudinal clinical data from a single center for Chinese CKD patients. The cohort included 987 patients who were followed up for more than 24 months. Fifty-three laboratory features were considered for inclusion in the model. The primary outcome in our study was an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤15 mL/min/1.73 m Results: Over a median follow-up period of 3.75 years, 148 patients experienced kidney failure. The optimal model was based on stacking different classifier algorithms with six laboratory features, including 24-h urine protein, potassium, glucose, urea, prealbumin and total protein. The model had considerable predictive power, with AUC values of 0.896 and 0.771 in the validation and external datasets, respectively. This model also accurately predicted the progression of renal function in patients over different follow-up periods after their initial assessment. Conclusions: A prediction model that leverages routinely collected laboratory features in the Chinese population can accurately identify patients with CKD at high risk of progressing to kidney failure. An online version of the model can be easily and quickly applied in clinical management and treatment.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionGlomerular Filtration RateMachine LearningRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAdultAgedAlgorithmsChinaClinical Laboratory Information SystemsEast Asian PeopleElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsChronic kidney diseaseLaboratory information systemsMachine learningPredictionProgression

Identifiers

PMID39498292
PMCPMC11533905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.