ArticlePeerJ2024
A novel nomogram to predict the risk of requiring mechanical ventilation in patients with sepsis within 48 hours of admission: a retrospective analysis.
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a predictive model for invasive ventilation risk within 48 hours of admission in patients with early sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Respiratory Failure in Patients With Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury (SA-AKI) Within 48 Hours of Admission.Emergency medicine international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To establish a model that can predict the risk of requiring mechanical ventilation within 48 h after admission in patients with sepsis. Methods: Data for patients with sepsis admitted to Dongyang People's Hospital from October 2011 to October 2023 were collected and divided into a modeling group and a validation group. Independent risk factors in the modeling group were analyzed, and a corresponding predictive nomogram was established. The model was evaluated for discriminative power (the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC), calibration degree (Hosmer-Lemeshow test), and clinical benefit (decision curve analysis, DCA). Models based on the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) scores and multiple machine learning methods were also established. Results: The independent factors related to the risk of requiring mechanical ventilation in patients with sepsis within 48 h included lactic acid, pro-brain natriuretic peptide (PRO-BNP), and albumin levels, as well as prothrombin time, the presence of lung infection, and D-dimer levels. The AUC values of nomogram model in the modeling group and validation group were 0.820 and 0.837, respectively. The nomogram model had a good fit and clinical value. The AUC values of the models constructed using SOFA scores and NEWSs were significantly lower than those of the nomogram ( Conclusion: The established nomogram could effectively predict the risk of requiring mechanical ventilation within 48 h of admission by patients with sepsis. Thus, the model can be used for the treatment and management of sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.