Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39498284›Full record

ReviewJPRAS open2024

Available techniques to minimize scars in surgical management of gynecomastia - a comprehensive review.

G Frigerio, A Serre, P E Engels, D F Kalbermatten, D André-Lévigne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JPRAS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diseases of the Male Breast: Gynecomastia and Breast Cancer.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

G FrigerioDivision of plastic and reconstructive surgery, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
A SerreDivision of plastic and reconstructive surgery, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
P E EngelsDivision of plastic and reconstructive surgery, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
D F KalbermattenDivision of plastic and reconstructive surgery, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
D André-LévigneDivision of plastic and reconstructive surgery, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Gynecomastia and lipomastia are benign proliferations of the male breast affecting 32-65% of men. Numerous surgical procedures often result in stigmatizing scars when it comes to skin resection. The purpose of this study was to review skin-sparing techniques and to describe our skin-sparing approach to treat skin excess using transcutaneous netting. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted aiming at identifying available techniques to avoid skin resection in gynecomastia or lipomastia patients (Simon's grade IIb and III). Surgical techniques, patient satisfaction, time of follow-up, and complications were assessed. Results: Seven studies detailed skin retraction techniques, including laser-, ultrasound-, and radiofrequency-assisted liposuction (LAL, UAL, and RAL), microneedling, and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) plaster lifting. All articles provided Simon's grade classification, with most studies including patients with and without skin laxity. Complication rates were low (1.5-10%), and patient satisfaction ranged from 87.5% to 100%.While transcutaneous netting has been reported to reduce hematoma in gynecomastia surgery, no studies specifically examined its role in managing skin redundancy. Conclusions: Limited data exist on scarless skin retraction techniques for gynecomastia. While LAL, UAL, and RAL show some potential, controlled studies are lacking, and skin resection is often performed for high skin redundancy. We recommend a skin-sparing approach using liposuction and transcutaneous netting for gynecomastia up to Simon's grade III, which allows for skin retraction and NAC fixation. No literature was found assessing the efficacy of transcutaneous netting in promoting skin retraction in gynecomastia.

Indexed as

Aesthetic surgeryGynecomastiaHematoma preventionHemostatic netLiposuctionMale chestSkin excess

Identifiers

PMID39498284
PMCPMC11532728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.