ReviewJPRAS open2024
Available techniques to minimize scars in surgical management of gynecomastia - a comprehensive review.
Review in JPRAS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic Subcutaneous Mastectomy with Cold-Knife Flap Dissection Through a Single Axillary Incision for Gynaecomastia.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Dual-time-point ICGA for perfusion-guided transaxillary single-port endoscopic gynecomastia surgery: a prospective exploratory comparative cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- From Etiology to Aesthetic Surgery: Mapping Knowledge Domains and Emerging Trends in Gynecomastia Research: 35-Year Bibliometric Analysis.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Review
- Side-Specific 24 h Pre-Removal Drainage Volume and Fluid-Related Complications After Endoscopic Gynecomastia Surgery.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Correction of Gynecomastia with Combination of Ultrasonic Liposuction (VASER) and Gland Excision through a Minimal Scar Incision: A Multi-Center Experience.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Diseases of the Male Breast: Gynecomastia and Breast Cancer.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Review
- Cross-chest liposuction plus gland resection through single minimal incision for management of grade I/II gynecomastia.BMC surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Gynecomastia and lipomastia are benign proliferations of the male breast affecting 32-65% of men. Numerous surgical procedures often result in stigmatizing scars when it comes to skin resection. The purpose of this study was to review skin-sparing techniques and to describe our skin-sparing approach to treat skin excess using transcutaneous netting. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted aiming at identifying available techniques to avoid skin resection in gynecomastia or lipomastia patients (Simon's grade IIb and III). Surgical techniques, patient satisfaction, time of follow-up, and complications were assessed. Results: Seven studies detailed skin retraction techniques, including laser-, ultrasound-, and radiofrequency-assisted liposuction (LAL, UAL, and RAL), microneedling, and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) plaster lifting. All articles provided Simon's grade classification, with most studies including patients with and without skin laxity. Complication rates were low (1.5-10%), and patient satisfaction ranged from 87.5% to 100%.While transcutaneous netting has been reported to reduce hematoma in gynecomastia surgery, no studies specifically examined its role in managing skin redundancy. Conclusions: Limited data exist on scarless skin retraction techniques for gynecomastia. While LAL, UAL, and RAL show some potential, controlled studies are lacking, and skin resection is often performed for high skin redundancy. We recommend a skin-sparing approach using liposuction and transcutaneous netting for gynecomastia up to Simon's grade III, which allows for skin retraction and NAC fixation. No literature was found assessing the efficacy of transcutaneous netting in promoting skin retraction in gynecomastia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.