ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2024
Study on the preparation of stabilizer-free silymarin nanocrystals and its oral absorption mechanisms.
Article in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- N-Acetylcysteine-Functionalized Mixed Micelles Overcome Multiple Intestinal Barriers to Improve Oral Bioavailability and Antioxidant Protection of Imperatorin.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Crystal engineering for poorly water-soluble drugs: From design to applications.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Ulcerative colitis therapeutic effects and pharmacokinetics of flexible quercetin nanocrystals prepared with geniposide assistance.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Efficient synthesis of aqueous soluble Silymarin nanocrystals from Silybum marianum and assessment of their antibacterial and cytotoxicity insights.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many researchers have studied the oral absorption mechanisms yet, however, considering stabilizers often participate in the absorption process of nanocrystals, these known mechanisms may be incorrect. Hence in this study, we aimed to explore the correct absorption mechanism of nanocrystals by performing related studies on stabilizer-free nanocrystals. We firstly prepared stabilizer-free silymarin nanocrystals by high-pressure homogenization, and then performed absorption-related studies, such as solubility, dissolution rate, pharmacokinetic study, cellular uptake and intracellular transport. Results showed the stabilizer-free silymarin nanocrystals had an average particle size of (450.2 ± 4.46) nm, with PDI of 0.280 ± 0.021 and Zeta potential of -26.9 ± 2.4 mV. The conversion of silymarin crude drug to stabilizer-free silymarin nanocrystals increased the compound's solubility by 1.41 times, with a dissolution rate of 92.2 % in water within 30 min compared to 38.5 % for crude drugs. Pharmacokinetic studies showed the oral bioavailability of stabilizer-free silymarin nanocrystals was found to be 1.48 times greater than that of the crude drugs. The cell experimentation results demonstrated that the stabilizer-silymarin nanocrystals can improve uptake but have poor transmembrane transport properties. Most researchers believe that nanocrystals can enhance transmembrane transport of drugs via an endocytosis-mediated pathway. In fact, nanocrystals are indeed endocytosed more by the cells, but this transport pathway is poor because the cells lack the intracellular transport pathway to transport nanocrystals from the AP side to the BP side. Therefore, we believe that the intracellular transport of nanocrystals can be enhanced by modifications and other carriers if needed to improve nanocrystals' ability to promote oral absorption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.