ArticleFood chemistry: X2024
TMT-based quantitative proteomics reveals the effects of electromagnetic field and freezing preservation techniques on mutton quality.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- TMT-Based Quantitative Proteomics Reveals the Molecular Mechanism Underlying Quality Deterioration of Refrigerated Northern Pike (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of electromagnetic field preservation (EP) and freezing storage (FS) on the quality of northern Qianbei Ma mutton. Using tandem mass tagging (TMT)-labeled quantitative proteomics and bioinformatics, it was observed that EP more effectively inhibited pH increase and maintained a* and b* values compared to FS. Furthermore, the EP group was able to better maintain the water-holding capacity and tenderness of the mutton under prolonged storage. Proteomics analysis identified 397 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) between the two storage methods at the same storage duration. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses indicated that proteins such as A0A452DSW4, A0A452E8M7, and D3JYV6 were involved in energy metabolism and redox processes, while A0A452EJ66, A0A452DSW4, and A0A452FJE8 played significant roles in protein binding. Overall, EP technology demonstrated superior benefits for maintaining mutton quality, suggesting a novel approach for mutton preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.