ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2024
Challenges in Managing Vancomycin Flushing Syndrome Following Vancomycin-Loaded Bone Cement for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Case Report.
Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a critical complication following arthroplasties, often treated with a two-stage revision using antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacers. Although these spacers can effectively manage infections, they occasionally cause severe adverse reactions. We reported the case of a 68-year-old female who developed vancomycin flushing syndrome (VFS), previously known as the red man syndrome, following the insertion of a vancomycin-loaded bone cement spacer during the first-stage revision surgery for PJI after undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Six hours postoperatively, she developed pruritus, diffuse rash, tachycardia, and hypotension. VFS was diagnosed based on clinical presentation after excluding other potential causes. She was treated with intravenous epinephrine, antihistamines, steroids, and fluid resuscitation without requiring spacer removal. The patient recovered uneventfully, underwent second-stage reimplantation after 6 weeks, and remained asymptomatic at 2-year follow-up. This highlights the importance of anticipating and managing this potentially severe reaction through a multidisciplinary approach, considering the risks and benefits of retaining versus removing antibiotic-loaded bone-cement spacers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.