ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024
Breakthrough Rectal
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms, management and prevention of anorectal sexually transmitted infections.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- New Insights into Gonorrhea Natural History and Protection by 4CMenB, and a Call for More Analyses of Existing Studies and Enhanced Data Collection.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Isolation of human monoclonal antibodies from 4CMenB vaccinees reveals PorB and LOS as the main OMV components inducing cross-strain protection.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: 4CMenB appears to be effective in reducing Methods: This was a retrospective study of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) vaccinated with 4CMenB (2 doses) between 2017 and 2023 at the San Raffaele Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute), Milan, Italy, and tested for rectal Ng. Rectal Ng infection is considered breakthrough if it occurs >1 month after the second 4CMenB dose and with positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) result. Follow-up was from July 2017 (first 4CMenB vaccination) to November 2023 (data freeze). Rectal Ng was screened with both NAAT and gonococcal-specific cultures. Characteristics of individuals with or without breakthrough Ng and of Ng infections before or after 4CMenB were compared using Mann-Whitney and χ Results: Overall, 473 GBMSM vaccinated with 4CMenB were included, with a median age (interquartile range) of 43 (37-51) years; 451 of 473 were living with human immunodeficiency virus. The percentage of NAAT-positive rectal Ng swab samples was 76 of 957 (7.7%) after 4CMenB and 51 of 456 (11.1%) before. Breakthrough rectal Ng after baseline were 76 in 57 of 473 people. People with rectal Ng after 4CMenB were younger, more likely to have a previous sexually transmitted infection, and had more sexual partners than those without (all Conclusions: Breakthrough rectal Ng infections after 4CMenB were 76 in 57/473 people, preferentially identified in GBMSM with higher-risk sexual behaviors, were less often symptomatic, and more often with negative gonococcal-specific cultures, suggesting lower infection virulence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.