ArticleHeliyon2024
Biomass power plant prospects in Indonesia's energy transition: IPP and PLN perspectives.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In an attempt to accelerate the energy transition, the government of Indonesia released a new regulation regarding renewable energy tariffs, including for biomass power plants (BPPs). However, a gap persists in the academic literature focusing on biomass power plants under these new tariffs. This study examines the role of biomass power plants (BPP) in meeting Indonesia's renewable energy targets, with a specific focus on recently introduced renewable energy tariffs. Three scenarios were developed to comprehensively understand Indonesia's state-owned electricity company (PLN) perspective and Independent Power Producers (IPPs) perspective, with a case study in Kundur Island, Riau Province. The financial analysis for IPPs shows in an NPV of $1.8 million under the initial tariff, while the expansion tariff results in an NPV of -$0.3 million. Sensitivity analysis reveals that a capacity factor exceeding 94.5 % is required to yield a positive NPV under the expansion tariff. From PLN's perspective, BPPs under the initial tariff correspond to an NPV of $8.48 million, and a B-C ratio of 2.31, resulting in a financially viable project, due to substantial cost savings from de-dieselization. Furthermore, the emission analysis highlights an 83.7 % decrease in emissions emitted with the utilization of BPPs compared to diesel power plants. These findings underscore the need to incorporate average generation cost in formulating renewable energy tariffs. Ensuring renewable energy projects are economically sustainable for both PLN and IPPs, stimulates widespread adoption and sustains cost-savings, all while advancing energy transition and making energy more accessible for everyone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.