ArticleHeliyon2024
Identifying at-risk patients for congenital heart disease using integrated predictive models and fuzzy clustering analysis: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based physiological risk stratification in night-shift hospital workers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A fuzzy time-series driven ensemble approach for accurate forecasting of higher education rankings.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prioritization of patients at risk of heart attack using a novel full-objective ITARA based on Random Forest and Decision tree.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital heart disease (CHD) remains a significant global health concern, affecting approximately 1 % of newborns worldwide. While its accurate causes often remain elusive, a combination of genetic and environmental factors is implicated. In this cross-sectional study, we propose a comprehensive prediction framework leveraging Machine Learning (ML) and Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) techniques to enhance CHD diagnostics and forecasting. Our framework integrates supervised and unsupervised learning methodologies to remove data noise and address imbalanced datasets effectively. Through the utilization of imbalance ensemble methods and clustering algorithms such as K-means, we enhance predictive accuracy, particularly in non-clinical datasets where imbalances are prevalent. Our results demonstrate an improvement of 8 % in recall compared to existing literature, showcasing the efficacy of our approach. Moreover, our framework identifies clusters of patients at the highest risk using MADM techniques, providing insights into susceptibility to CHD. Fuzzy clustering techniques further assess the degree of risk for individuals within each cluster, enabling personalized risk evaluation. Importantly, our analysis reveals that unhealthy lifestyle factors, annual per capita income, nutrition, and folic acid supplementation emerge as crucial predictors of CHD occurrences. Additionally, environmental risk factors and maternal illnesses significantly contribute to the predictive model. These findings underscore the multifactorial nature of CHD development, emphasizing the importance of considering socioeconomic and lifestyle factors alongside medical variables in CHD risk assessment and prevention strategies. Our proposed framework offers a promising avenue for early identification and intervention, potentially mitigating the burden of CHD on affected individuals and healthcare systems globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.