ArticleHeliyon2024
A comparative analysis on the dynamics of solid-liquid interfacial layer and nanoparticle diameter of magnetohydrodynamic nanofluid flow containing spherical and cylindrical-shaped alumina nanoparticles over a stretching curved surface.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, a comparative analysis on magnetohydrodynamic nanofluid flow containing spherical and cylindrical-shaped alumina nanoparticles over a stretching curved surface is mainly focused. The effects of Brownian motion, Joule heating, thermophoresis, chemical reaction and activation energy are taken into consideration in this work. It is important to mention that this analysis considers a 4 % volume fraction of the alumina nanoparticles. A thermal convective and zero-mass flux conditions are imposed to scrutinize the heat transfer analysis. The leading equations are transformed into dimensionless form by using suitable similarity variables. A numerical solution is obtained using the shooting technique. The acquired outcomes depict that greater magnetic factor enhances the skin friction coefficient. The greater magnetic factor, thermal Biot number, Eckert number, and interfacial layer thickness augment the heat transfer rate, while a greater nanoparticle diameter diminishes the thermal transfer rate. A higher magnetic factor has an increasing impact on thermal distribution and a reducing impact on velocity distribution. A greater curvature factor enhances both the velocity and thermal distributions. The concentration distribution is enhanced by the higher interfacial layer thickness and activation energy factor, while it is reduced by a higher nanoparticle diameter, Brownian motion factor, and chemical reaction factor. From the comparative analysis, it is found that the velocity, thermal, and concentration distributions are higher for the cylindrical-shaped nanoparticles compared to spherical-shaped nanoparticles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.