ArticleCureus2024
Innovative Management of a Giant Fibroid in Pregnancy: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Combined cesarean section and myomectomy increases perioperative risks and affects postpartum recovery in women with uterine fibroids during late pregnancy.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumors of the female reproductive system, frequently found in women. Although typically asymptomatic during pregnancy, complications can arise in some cases. Management of fibroids during pregnancy often involves a conservative approach, with myomectomy considered after delivery. Alternatively, cesarean or antepartum myomectomy can be tailored according to the patient's needs. In this case report, we present a G2P1 patient who, during her second trimester, experienced increased abdominal girth, pelvic discomfort, constipation, and urinary incontinence. An early multidisciplinary team (MDT) consultation, involving obstetrics and gynecology, general surgery, and urology, identified a massive posterior fibroid as the cause of these obstructive and compressive symptoms. The patient was admitted for symptom relief and ultimately underwent an elective cesarean section at 35 weeks of gestation. The outcome was a live male baby weighing 2.5 kg. Two months later, an interval myomectomy was performed, successfully removing a massive fibroid measuring 22x17x10 cm and weighing 7 kg. While cesarean myomectomy is considered a safe procedure with no greater risk than a cesarean section alone and is also a cost-effective approach, it was not feasible in this case due to the fibroid's proximity to major pelvic blood vessels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.