Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39497886›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

A Report of a Case of Reactivation of Plaque Morphea After Sunlight Exposure and a Literature Review.

Zlatina Ivanova

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zlatina IvanovaDermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, BGR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present the case of a 61-year-old woman with a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of plaque morphea. The disease began about four years ago with the appearance of a single oval sclerotic plaque located on the front surface of the right lower leg. After topical treatment, the plaque underwent reverse development. Two years later, after intense exposure to the sun, reactivation of the plaque occurred with the development of a peripheral reddening of the "lilac ring" type, thickening, and induration of the affected skin. After topical treatment, the plaque regressed again after six months. The next summer, the patient regularly used topical photoprotective agents and avoided prolonged exposure to solar radiation, during which no new reactivation of the plaque occurred. The observed case suggests that UV light (sunlight) could be a triggering factor for the reactivation of plaque morphea.

Indexed as

literature reviewmorpheareactivationsunlighttriggering factor

Identifiers

PMID39497886
PMCPMC11533203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.