ArticleCureus2024
Renal Leiomyoma in a Female Adult: A Histopathological Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renal leiomyomas are rare benign mesenchymal tumors that arise from the smooth muscle cells in the renal capsule, renal pelvis, and the smooth muscles of vessels in the kidney. They are usually found by accident during autopsies or on different imaging modalities made on other occasions. The clinical presentation may include hematuria and abdominal or flank pain, although renal leiomyomas are most frequently asymptomatic. This case concerns a 45-year-old woman with an asymptomatic tumor mass in the left kidney, discovered incidentally on an outpatient CT scan conducted on an unrelated occasion. Histological examination revealed well-demarcated tumor formation on regular hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining consisting of intersecting fascicles of spindle cells with blunt-ended, cigar-shaped nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm. The neoplasm showed no mitotic activity. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to exclude different spindle cell pathologies, such as solitary fibrous tumor of the kidney, primary leiomyosarcoma, and, less probably, sarcomatoid variants of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Tumor cell cytoplasm was positive for h-caldesmon, smooth muscle actin (SMA), and desmin. The proliferation index Kiel-67 (Ki-67) was evaluated as less than 1%. Considering the microscopic description and the IHC results, the neoplasm was interpreted as a renal leiomyoma. In light of the rarity of these tumors, pathologists should consider differential diagnosis with precision. In challenging cases, immunohistochemical examination can be beneficial to distinguish between several spindle cell renal neoplasms, such as solitary fibrous tumor, leiomyosarcoma, sarcomatoid variant of RCC, fat-poor angiomyolipoma, benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors, renomedullary interstitial cell tumor, benign fibrous histiocytoma, primary angiosarcoma, mucinous tubular and spindle cell renal cell carcinoma (MTSRCC).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.