ArticleCureus2024
A Multi-Hospital Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Probiotics Versus Placebo in Preventing Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea in Adult Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From One-Size-Fits-All to Precision Medicine: The Promise of Personalized Probiotics.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) is a prevalent complication of antibiotic therapy, attributed to disruptions in gut microbiota. Probiotics are increasingly studied for their potential in preventing AAD by restoring microbial balance.
objectiveThe aim of this investigation was to assess the efficacy of probiotics in reducing AAD in adult patients when compared to a placebo. METHODOLOGY: This research was conducted from March 2023 to March 2024 using a randomized, placebo-controlled design at multiple institutions: Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar; Prime Teaching Hospital, Peshawar; Mufti Mahmood Memorial Teaching Hospital, Dera Ismail Khan; Shalamar Hospital, Lahore; University Hospitals of Leicester; and DHQ Teaching Hospital Kohat, enrolling 340 adult patients prescribed systemic antibiotics. Eligible participants were aged 18 years and older, while those with chronic diarrhea, inflammatory bowel disease, immunodeficiency, recent probiotic or antibiotic use, or inability to provide informed consent were excluded. The sample size was calculated using WHO guidelines, resulting in a target of 340 to ensure adequate power. Participants were randomized to receive either probiotics (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium longum BB536) or placebo, administered within 24 hours of starting antibiotics. Daily monitoring of bowel habits and symptoms was performed using standardized diaries, and adherence was evaluated through pill counts. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27 (Released 2020; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States), comparing the incidence, severity, and duration of AAD between groups, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05.
resultsIn the probiotic group, 31 patients (18.23%) developed AAD compared to 53 patients (31.17%) in the placebo group (p=0.01). Among those with AAD, the probiotic group experienced a shorter duration (mean 3.5 ± 1.2 days) compared to placebo (mean 5.1 ± 1.8 days, p=0.002). Adherence rates were high in both groups (probiotic: 96.4%, placebo: 95.9%). Significant improvements in bowel habits were reported more frequently in the probiotic group (77.06%) than placebo (50.59%, p=0.02). The hospital stay duration was similar between groups (probiotic: mean 7.8 ± 2.1 days, placebo: mean 8.3 ± 2.4 days, p=0.15).
conclusionProbiotics significantly reduced the incidence and duration of AAD compared to placebo, with high adherence and favorable patient-reported outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.