ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
A cross-sectional study of evidence-based practice and its determinants among healthcare professionals in Northwest Ethiopia.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers to evidence-based practice (EBP) among healthcare providers at Port Said: an exploratory sequential mixed method study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Assessing readiness for evidence-based practice among healthcare professionals in Egypt.BMC medical education · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the integration of current best evidence with clinical expertise by considering patient preferences and values. Evidence based practice has not been well studied in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to assess EBP and its determinants among health professionals working at primary public hospitals in the Central Gondar zone, Northwest Ethiopia. Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted on 422 health professionals. A simple random sampling technique was used to select the study participants. The data were entered into EpiData version 4.6 and exported to SPSS version 25 for analysis. The descriptive, bivariable, and multivariable logistic regression analysis were conducted. Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals and Result: About 44.1% (95%CI: 39, 50%) of healthcare professionals had good evidence-based practice. Educational status (AOR: 3.05, CI: 1.07-8.66), spare time (AOR: 1.90, CI: 1.09, 3.31), good knowledge (AOR: 7.95, CI: 4.83, 13.08), good skill (AOR: 2.39: CI: 1.27, 4.53), training (AOR: 2.13, CI: 1.26, 3.58), and internet access (AOR = 2.02: 95% CI: 1.25-3.27) were found to be significant predictors of evidence-based practice. Conclusion: This study revealed that EBP was low compared to national standards. Moreover, having good knowledge and skill about evidence-based practice, being trained, having spare time and internet access and upgrading educational status of health care professionals would enhance good evidence-based practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.