ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Case report: Two-step lamellar keratoplasty for alkali burns.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inflammatory Myeloid Cell Resurgence and Impaired Pro-Resolution Macrophage Maintenance Characterize Chronic Corneal Alkali Burn.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To report a case of a patient with ocular surface alkali burn who developed corneal perforation before entering a stable phase. This patient was treated with a custom-designed lamellar graft using a Two-Step lamellar keratoplasty (LK) after 3 months alkali burn. Methods: This study was a case report. Results: A 43-year-old male patient who presented with redness, pain, and decreased vision in his left eye following lime exposure. Initial treatment involved amniotic membrane transplantation and anterior chamber irrigation. However, the patient subsequently developed corneal infiltration and progressive thinning. The patient refused the corneal transplantation and ultimately underwent tarsorrhaphy. Twenty days postoperatively, the patient experienced sudden ocular pain and central corneal perforation. Considering the potential complications of conventional corneal transplantation, including stem cell deficiency, graft dissolution, and rejection, a personalized Two-Step LK was devised. Following this procedure, the patient's vision gradually improved to 20/133 (without correction), with a good corneal condition but mild epithelial defects and edema. At the 8-month follow-up, subepithelial corneal haze was observed, but uncorrected visual acuity remained stable at 20/133 and best corrected visual acuity was up to 20/66. Conclusion: For patients with ocular surface alkali burns who experience persistent disease progression despite early and mid-stage aggressive interventions, this study is the first to report on the use of a Two-Step LK. This approach takes into account both the "soil" factors that may lead to graft dissolution and the "seed" factors related to recipient stem cell deficiency. The results in preventing graft dissolution and maintaining postoperative corneal function are encouraging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.