Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39497838›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

LesionNet: an automated approach for skin lesion classification using SIFT features with customized convolutional neural network.

Sarah A Alzakari, Stephen Ojo, James Wanliss, Muhammad Umer, Shtwai Alsubai, Areej Alasiry, Mehrez Marzougui, Nisreen Innab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah A AlzakariDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Stephen OjoCollege of Engineering, Anderson University, Anderson, SC, United States.
James WanlissCollege of Engineering, Anderson University, Anderson, SC, United States.
Muhammad UmerDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Shtwai AlsubaiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Areej AlasiryDepartment of Informatics and Computer Systems, College of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Mehrez MarzouguiDepartment of Computer Engineering, College of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Nisreen InnabDepartment of Computer Science and Information Systems, College of Applied Sciences, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate detection of skin lesions through computer-aided diagnosis has emerged as a critical advancement in dermatology, addressing the inefficiencies and errors inherent in manual visual analysis. Despite the promise of automated diagnostic approaches, challenges such as image size variability, hair artifacts, color inconsistencies, ruler markers, low contrast, lesion dimension differences, and gel bubbles must be overcome. Researchers have made significant strides in binary classification problems, particularly in distinguishing melanocytic lesions from normal skin conditions. Leveraging the "MNIST HAM10000" dataset from the International Skin Image Collaboration, this study integrates Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) features with a custom convolutional neural network model called LesionNet. The experimental results reveal the model's robustness, achieving an impressive accuracy of 99.28%. This high accuracy underscores the effectiveness of combining feature extraction techniques with advanced neural network models in enhancing the precision of skin lesion detection.

Indexed as

computer visioncustomized CNNdeep learningSIFT featuresskin lesion classification

Identifiers

PMID39497838
PMCPMC11532583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.