ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2024
Comparison of qPCR and chromogenic culture methods for rapid detection of group B streptococcus colonization in Vietnamese pregnant women.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Rapid tests for detecting group B streptococcus colonization in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Pooled it
- Establishment and characterization of a genomic DNA reference material for Group B Streptococcus detection.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- A newborn derived monoclonal IgM antibody selectively modulates microbial metabolism in the gut.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Prevalence, risk factors, and serotypes of group BTherapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neonatal infections can rapidly become severe, with delays in treatment often proving fatal. Materials and methods: Pregnant women aged 35 weeks gestation or more were recruited. Rectovaginal swabs were collected and analyzed for GBS using chromogenic culture, a commercial real-time PCR kit, and in-house real-time PCR assays targeting the Results: The study included 259 pregnant women with a mean age of 30.2 ± 5.0 years. Of these, 96.6 % had gestational ages of 37 weeks or more at delivery. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the Conclusions: Both direct real-time PCR assays demonstrated high accuracy and were comparable to chromogenic culture in diagnosing GBS. A significant prevalence of GBS colonization was found among Vietnamese pregnant women in their final trimester.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.