Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39497744›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Thyroid scintigraphy of healthy cats using small-field-of-view gamma cameras.

Sijin Cha, Yeon Chae, Taesik Yun, Hakhyun Kim, Byeong-Teck Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sijin Cha *Laboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Yeon Chae *Laboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Taesik YunLaboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Hakhyun KimLaboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Byeong-Teck KangLaboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Small-field-of-view (SFOV) gamma cameras can offer higher sensitivities than conventional gamma cameras. However, there are currently no reports on the efficacy and safety of thyroid scintigraphy using SFOV gamma cameras in veterinary medicine. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and radiation safety of an SFOV gamma camera for feline thyroid scintigraphy. Materials and methods: Three veterinary staff members (operator, staff 1, and staff 2) performed thyroid scintigraphy on 10 healthy cats in this study. The operator administered either 2 or 4 mCi of technetium-99m pertechnetate ( Results: The TSR and TBR median values aligned with the previously reported normal range obtained using a large-field-of-view gamma camera. There were no notable differences in TSR and TBR between the two doses of Conclusion: The SFOV gamma camera demonstrated adequate image quality for thyroid scintigraphy in healthy cats even with relatively low doses and short acquisition conditions. Radiation exposure during the procedure posed minimal safety concerns. Therefore, the SFOV gamma camera could be a valuable tool for evaluating thyroid glands in cats.

Indexed as

occupational radiation exposureradiation exposuresmall field of view (SFOV) gamma cameratechnetium-99m pertechnetatethyroid scintigraphy

Identifiers

PMID39497744
PMCPMC11533270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.