ArticleFrontiers in physiology2024
Evaluating the impact of electrode planes on regional lung function assessment.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to explore the influence of the measurement plane on regional lung function assessed via electrical impedance tomography (EIT). Methods: The forced vital capacity (FVC) maneuver was prospectively performed in 30 healthy male volunteers. Simultaneously, EIT measurements were conducted at the 3rd, 4th, and 5th intercostal spaces (ICS). The EIT-based spirometry parameters are calculated in a similar manner to their original definitions. The spatial and temporal distributions of the corresponding functional images were assessed and compared among the measurement planes. Results: All subjects but one were able to perform the FVC maneuver according to the guidelines. Significant differences were found in 67% (6 out of 9) of the EIT-based parameters assessing the spatial and temporal distribution. The fEIT images were most homogeneous at ICS 4 compared to the other two measurement planes, except for the time required for 75% of FVC. The fEIT image FVC Conclusion: The spatial and temporal distribution of the regional lung function measured via EIT was influenced by the measurement planes. We recommend adhering to the same measurement plane for before-after comparison. ICS 4 was recommended for the sitting subjects performing lung function testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.