Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39497688›Full record

ArticleFood technology and biotechnology2024

Effects of Green Extraction Methods on Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Artichoke (

Can Turksever, Duygu Benzer Gurel, Aslı Sahiner, Ozlem Çağındı, Ozlem Kizilirmak Esmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food technology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Can TurkseverFood Engineering Department, Ege University, Bornova, Ankara Street, 35040 Izmir, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9627-023X
Duygu Benzer GurelFood Engineering Department, Manisa Celal Bayar University, 45140 Manisa, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6143-1723
Aslı SahinerBiology Department, Ege University, Bornova, Ankara Street, 35040 Izmir, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5095-9461
Ozlem ÇağındıFood Engineering Department, Manisa Celal Bayar University, 45140 Manisa, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6436-9208
Ozlem Kizilirmak EsmerFood Engineering Department, Ege University, Bornova, Ankara Street, 35040 Izmir, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4652-0514

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research background: Artichoke leaves, an important waste product of the food industry, have an important antioxidant and antimicrobial capacity. Although there are several studies in the literature to determine their antioxidant and antimicrobial activity, a comparison of green extraction technologies including microwave, ultrasound probe and ultrasound bath methods in relation to the maceration technique has not been performed. Also, several parameters such as the extraction temperature, power, extraction mode and extraction time are important parameters for obtaining targeted compounds in the highest amount. For this reason, we aimed to compare various extraction methods including microwave-assisted extraction, ultrasound-assisted extraction with probe, ultrasound-assisted extraction in a water bath and maceration in terms of extraction parameters for obtaining bioactive compounds from artichoke leaves. Experimental approach: Microwave-assisted extraction at two different power values, ultrasound-assisted extraction with probe in continuous or pulsed mode with two different extraction times each, ultrasound-assisted extraction in a water bath at two different power values with two different extraction times each and maceration with two different times were used for the extraction. The extraction temperature is an important parameter affecting the thermal degradation of bioactive compounds. We used a constant extraction temperature of 50 °C. Total phenolic and total flavonoid content, antioxidant capacity, phenolic compound profile analysis by LC-QTOF-MS and antimicrobial activity by agar diffusion and broth microdilution methods were determined. Results and conclusions: The bioactive compounds were found to be significantly affected by the parameters used in each extraction method. The microwave-assisted extraction method was more efficient than the other extraction methods at both power values. This method also required the shortest extraction time. The ultrasound-assisted probe extraction method was the second most efficient method. The type of process, continuous or pulsed, did not affect the results, but shortening the extraction time led to lower results. A longer extraction time of the ultrasound-assisted extraction in a water bath method led to better results, similar to the ultrasound-assisted probe extraction, regardless of the used power. The extracts were highly effective against many opportunistic and pathogenic microorganisms. Novelty and scientific contribution: This study provides valuable insights into the extraction parameters of different extraction methods to obtain bioactive compounds from artichoke leaves, which could have potential applications in the food and pharmaceutical industries.

Indexed as

antimicrobial propertiesantioxidant propertiesartichoke leavesextraction parametersgreen extraction methods

Identifiers

PMID39497688
PMCPMC11531681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.