Trial reportCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of geographic atrophy lesion area in patients receiving pegcetacoplan treatment or sham.
Trial report in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Masked, Sham-Controlled Study of Safety, Tolerability and Evidence of Activity of Intravitreal APL-2 Therapy in Patients With Geographic Atrophy (GA)
A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Sham-Controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Pegcetacoplan Therapy With Sham Injections in Patients With Geographic Atrophy (GA) Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Sham-Controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Pegcetacoplan Therapy With Sham Injections in Patients With Geographic Atrophy (GA) Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of geographic atrophy lesion area in patients receiving pegcetacoplan treatment or sham.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Trial
- Outer Retinal Tubulation and Geographic Atrophy: A Natural History Analysis of Sham Observed Eyes from the OAKS and DERBY Trials.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- Population Pharmacokinetics of Pegcetacoplan in Patients with Geographic Atrophy or Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pegcetacoplan is a complement C3/C3b inhibitor indicated for the treatment of geographic atrophy (GA). A population pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis of pegcetacoplan used GA lesion area measurements from three clinical studies to determine the effect of pegcetacoplan exposure on GA progression. A base disease progression model was developed using data from sham-treated eyes and untreated fellow eyes, followed by treatment effect assessment in dose-response and PK/PD models. In total, 1501 patients from FILLY (NCT02503332), OAKS (NCT03525613), and DERBY (NCT03525600) received intravitreal pegcetacoplan 15 mg monthly or every other month (EOM) or sham treatment monthly or EOM and were included in the population analysis of lesion area. Disease progression over time was adequately described as linear-with-time over the 24-month maximal study duration. Disease-specific covariates associated with slower lesion growth were unilateral, unifocal, and subfoveal GA lesions and >20 intermediate or large drusen groups (≥63 μm) at baseline. The dose-response model estimated 0.80-fold (95% CI: 0.75, 0.84) and 0.83-fold (95% CI: 0.78, 0.87) reductions in GA lesion growth rate with pegcetacoplan monthly and EOM, respectively, versus sham. A relationship between vitreous humor concentration and GA lesion growth rate was quantified as 2.6% per unit of log-transformed vitreous pegcetacoplan concentration in the PK/PD model. PK/PD predictions of treatment effect based on exposure (pegcetacoplan monthly: 0.80 [90% CI: 0.77, 0.84]; pegcetacoplan EOM: 0.83 [90% CI: 0.80, 0.86]) were consistent with predictions based on dose response. These results support the benefit of pegcetacoplan administered monthly or EOM in slowing GA lesion growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.