Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39497597›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of haematology2025

Association of clonal haematopoiesis with recurrent venous thromboembolism: A case-control study.

Cornelia Englisch, Rafaela Vostatek, Theresa Schramm, Christoph J Binder, Ingrid Pabinger, Roland Jäger, Cihan Ay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clonal hematopoiesis and thrombosis risk-what are research and clinical gaps?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clonal Hematopoiesis Rates in a Recurrent Venous Thrombosis Population: A Prospective Pilot Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cornelia EnglischDivision of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9007-7738
Rafaela VostatekDivision of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Theresa SchrammDivision of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph J BinderDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ingrid PabingerDivision of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Roland JägerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Cihan AyDivision of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2607-9717

Funding

Cardiovascular Cluster (CVC) of the Medical University of ViennaÖsterreichischer Herzfonds
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the third most common cardiovascular disease. Clonal haematopoiesis (CH) is linked to cardiovascular disease risk, but its potential association with VTE remains poorly understood. We assessed the prevalence of CH in patients with recurrent VTE (n = 107; median age [IQR] 57 [48-63] years, 44.9% female) and matched healthy controls (n = 127; median age [IQR] 53 [45-60] years, 51.2% female) to investigate a putative association of CH with VTE risk. We detected 12 CH-associated mutations in 11 (10.3%) VTE cases and six mutations in 5 (3.9%) controls. Thus, patients with recurrent VTE tended to have higher odds of presenting with CH compared to controls (OR: 2.74, 95% CI: 0.95-9.16). Moreover, the odds of detecting CH were significantly higher in VTE cases in the subgroup of individuals without thrombophilia (OR: 4.58, 95% CI: 1.48-15.99). VTE cases with CH showed elevated platelet counts compared to cases and controls without CH (median [IQR]: 292 [254-298], 223 [198-260] and 220 [185-259] × 10

Indexed as

Clonal HematopoiesisVenous ThromboembolismCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationRecurrenceRisk FactorsThrombophiliaclonal haematopoiesisrisk factorsthromboembolismthrombophiliavenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID39497597
PMCPMC11739764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.