Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39497532›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

An Adaptive Leaky-Integrate and Firing Probability Model of an Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Fiber.

Rebecca C Felsheim, Mathias Dietz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A deep learning framework for understanding cochlear implants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rebecca C FelsheimDepartment of Medical Physics and Acoustics, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-6082-8536
Mathias DietzDepartment of Medical Physics and Acoustics, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Funding

European Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most neural models produce a spiking output and often represent the stochastic nature of the spike generation process via a stochastic output. Nonspiking neural models, on the other hand, predict the probability of a spike occurring in response to a stimulus. We propose a nonspiking model for an electrically stimulated auditory nerve fiber, which not only predicts the total probability of a spike occurring in response to a biphasic pulse but also the distribution of the spike time. Our adaptive leaky-integrate and firing probability (aLIFP) model can account for refractoriness, facilitation, accommodation, and long-term adaptation. All model parameters have been fitted to single cell recordings from electrically stimulated cat auditory nerve fibers. Afterward, the model was validated on recordings from auditory nerve fibers from cats and guinea pigs. The nonspiking nature of the model makes it fast and deterministic while still accounting for the stochastic nature of the spike generation process. Therefore, the relationship between the input to the model or model parameters and the model's output can be observed more directly than with stochastically spiking models.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsCochlear NerveElectric StimulationModels, NeurologicalStochastic ProcessesAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsCatsGuinea PigsNerve FibersProbabilityRefractory Period, ElectrophysiologicalTime Factorsadaptive threshold neuron modelauditory modelauditory nerve fibercochlear implantelectrical stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39497532
PMCPMC11536406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.