ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2024
Integrating Contact Tracing Data to Enhance Outbreak Phylodynamic Inference: A Deep Learning Approach.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PhyloCNN: Improving Tree Representation and Neural Network Architecture for Deep Learning from Trees in Phylodynamics and Diversification Studies.Systematic biology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Disease Diagnostic Technologies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phylodynamics is central to understanding infectious disease dynamics through the integration of genomic and epidemiological data. Despite advancements, including the application of deep learning to overcome computational limitations, significant challenges persist due to data inadequacies and statistical unidentifiability of key parameters. These issues are particularly pronounced in poorly resolved phylogenies, commonly observed in outbreaks such as SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we conducted a thorough evaluation of PhyloDeep, a deep learning inference tool for phylodynamics, assessing its performance on poorly resolved phylogenies. Our findings reveal the limited predictive accuracy of PhyloDeep (and other state-of-the-art approaches) in these scenarios. However, models trained on poorly resolved, realistically simulated trees demonstrate improved predictive power, despite not being infallible, especially in scenarios with superspreading dynamics, whose parameters are challenging to capture accurately. Notably, we observe markedly improved performance through the integration of minimal contact tracing data, which refines poorly resolved trees. Applying this approach to a sample of SARS-CoV-2 sequences partially matched to contact tracing from Hong Kong yields informative estimates of superspreading potential, extending beyond the scope of contact tracing data alone. Our findings demonstrate the potential for enhancing phylodynamic analysis through complementary data integration, ultimately increasing the precision of epidemiological predictions crucial for public health decision-making and outbreak control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.