Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39497348›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2025

Stimulus-induced rotary saturation imaging of visually evoked response: A pilot study.

Milena Capiglioni, Roland Beisteiner, Pedro Lima Cardoso, Federico Turco, Baudouin Jin, Claus Kiefer, Simon Daniel Robinson, Andrea Federspiel, Siegfried Trattnig, Roland Wiest

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Milena CapiglioniSupport Centre for Advanced Neuroimaging, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0695-0229
Roland BeisteinerDepartment of Neurology, Laboratory for Functional Brain Diagnostics and Therapy, High Field MR Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
Pedro Lima CardosoHigh Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Federico TurcoSupport Centre for Advanced Neuroimaging, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Baudouin JinSupport Centre for Advanced Neuroimaging, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Claus KieferSupport Centre for Advanced Neuroimaging, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Simon Daniel RobinsonHigh Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Andrea FederspielSupport Centre for Advanced Neuroimaging, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Siegfried TrattnigHigh Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Roland WiestSupport Centre for Advanced Neuroimaging, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

Kernen Fonds für EpilepsieforschungSchweizerische Epilesieliga Forschungspreis 2018Swiss National Science Foundation CRSII5-180365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spin-lock (SL) pulses have been proposed to directly detect neuronal activity otherwise inaccessible through standard functional magnetic resonance imaging. However, the practical limits of this technique remain unexplored. Key challenges in SL-based detection include ultra-weak signal variations, sensitivity to magnetic field inhomogeneities, and potential contamination from blood oxygen level-dependent effects, all of which hinder the reliable isolation of neuronal signals. This pilot study evaluates the performance of the stimulus-induced rotary saturation (SIRS) technique to map visual stimulation response in the human cortex. A rotary echo spin-lock (RESL) preparation followed by a 2D echo planar imaging readout was used to investigate 12 healthy subjects at rest and during continuous exposure to 8 Hz flickering light. The SL amplitude was fixed to the target neuroelectric oscillations at that frequency. The signal variance was used as contrast metric, and two alternative post-processing pipelines (regression-filtering-rectification and normalized subtraction) were statistically evaluated. Higher variance in the SL signal was detected in four of the 12 subjects. Although group-level analysis indicated activation in the occipital pole, analysis of variance revealed that this difference was not statistically significant, highlighting the need for comparable control measures and more robust preparations. Further optimization in sensitivity and robustness is required to noninvasively detect physiological neuroelectric activity in the human brain.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, VisualPhotic StimulationAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePilot ProjectsYoung Adultfunctional magnetic resonance imagingneuroelectric oscillationsneuronal activitynon‐BOLD fMRIspin‐lockvisual stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39497348
PMCPMC11602267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.