Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39497332›Full record

Observational studyClinical and experimental dental research2024

Low-Dose Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Swedish Pediatric Patients With Alveolar Clefts Following Alveolar Bone Grafting-A Clinical Study.

António Vicente, Josefine Cederhag, Nilofar Rashidi, Anna-Paulina Wiedel, Magnus Becker, Susanne Brogårdh-Roth, Xie-Qi Shi, Kristina Hellén-Halme

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06395077 (Diagnostic Efficiency of Low-dose Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Post-graft Evaluation of Swedish Paediatric Patients With Alveolar Clefts), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06395077 completednot on this map

Diagnostic Efficiency of Low-dose Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Post-graft Evaluation of Swedish Paediatric Patients With Alveolar Clefts

TypeobservationalSponsorMalmö UniversityRan2021 to 2024Enrolled11ConditionsAlveolar CleftArmsCBCT low-dose protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

António VicenteDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0007-0252-4165
Josefine CederhagDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4611-3708
Nilofar RashidiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0001-0025-8023
Anna-Paulina WiedelDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6088-1143
Magnus BeckerDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1915-1736
Susanne Brogårdh-RothDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2745-1816
Xie-Qi ShiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6967-4407
Kristina Hellén-HalmeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9885-0019

Funding

Region Skåne, Sweden, supported this study with research funds for Oral Health-Related Research. Malmö University provided open access funding.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate whether a low-dose cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) protocol provides diagnostically acceptable image quality for assessing bone healing after alveolar bone grafting. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe study cohort comprised 11 patients (aged 7-14 years) with orofacial clefts who had undergone alveolar bone grafting at Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, Sweden. During the postsurgical follow-up at 6 months, each patient was assessed twice: once with a standard-dose CBCT protocol and once with a low-dose CBCT protocol, which in total corresponds to one CBCT examination made with the exposure settings recommended by the manufacturer. Among others, the assessed parameters included subjective image quality, as well as bone graft height, thickness, and integration.

resultsNo significant differences were found between the standard- and low-dose protocols for most parameters (p > 0.05). Exceptions included subjective image quality (one observer, p = 0.05) and confidence levels during the assessment (three observers, p = 0.01, 0.01, 0.02).

conclusionsThe low-dose protocol yielded adequate image quality for postoperative CBCT healing assessment in patients who have undergone alveolar bone grafting. However, the confidence level of observers during the assessment with the low-dose protocol was reduced. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06395077). CLINICAL

trial registrationThis study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06395077).

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone GraftingCleft PalateCone-Beam Computed TomographyAdolescentChildCleft LipFemaleHumansMaleRadiation DosageSwedenTreatment OutcomeWound Healingalveolar bone graftingcone‐beam computed tomographyorofacial cleftradiation

Identifiers

PMID39497332
PMCPMC11534651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.