ArticleChembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology2025
RETRACTION: RETRACTION: High-Resolution Imaging of Human Cancer Proteins Using Microprocessor Materials.
Article in Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
retractionM. J. Solares, G. M. Jonaid, W. Y. Luqiu, S. Berry, J. Khadela, Y. Liang, M. C. Evans, K. J. Pridham, W. J. Dearnaley, Z. Sheng and D. F. Kelly, "High-Resolution Imaging of Human Cancer Proteins Using Microprocessor Materials," ChemBioChem, 23, no. 17 (2022), e202200310, https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202200310. The above article, published online on 5 July 2022 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Ruben Ragg; and Wiley-VCH GmbH. The retraction has been agreed following a thorough peer review process conducted by the author's institution, Penn State. The editors' own independent investigation confirmed that density map for the p53 dimer does not align well with the model for Figures 2B and S3 A. Furthermore, it was found that the coordinate and map files associated with the article available in the Protein Data Bank [PDB accession codes 8F2I (p53 monomer), 8F2H (p53 dimer)] and Electron Microscopy Data Bank [EMDB accession codes EMD28817 (p53 monomer), EMD28816 (p53 dimer)] exhibit poor alignment throughout. In addition, the authors did not provide original research data, maps and models in question, to justify the findings. The editors' own independent investigation confirmed that the conclusions of this manuscript are not sufficiently supported. Author D. F. Kelly responded to our notice of retraction, but did not state their agreement nor disagreement. Author G. M. Jonaid agrees with the retraction. All other authors did not respond to our notice regarding the retraction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.