Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39497223›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2024

Am I attached? A patient-partnered approach to creating infographics about attachment to primary care in Ontario, Canada.

Maggie MacNeil, Aya Tagami, Peter Sheffield, Vivian R Ramsden, Joan Barker, Jennifer Boyle, Clare Cruickshank, Eliot Frymire, Richard H Glazier, Anita Gombos Hill and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Maggie MacNeilSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. macnem18@mcmaster.ca.
Aya TagamiSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Peter SheffieldFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Vivian R RamsdenDepartment of Academic Family Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Joan BarkerPatient Expertise in Research Collaboration, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jennifer BoylePatient Expertise in Research Collaboration, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Clare CruickshankPatient Expertise in Research Collaboration, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Eliot FrymireHealth Services and Policy Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Richard H GlazierInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Anita Gombos HillGreater Hamilton Health Network, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Michael E GreenCollege of Family Physicians of Canada, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Mary HuangPatient Expertise in Research Collaboration, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Marijke JurriaansGreater Hamilton Health Network, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Caron LeidPatient Expertise in Research Collaboration, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Melissa McCallumGreater Hamilton Health Network, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Sarah PreciousGreater Hamilton Health Network, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jo-Ann StansPatient Expertise in Research Collaboration, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Julie VizzaFaculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON, Canada.
Murray WalzGreater Hamilton Health Network, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Sue WilkinsGreater Hamilton Health Network, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Rebecca GanannSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHaving a primary care provider is associated with better care experiences and lower care costs. In 2021, INSPIRE-PHC released Primary Care Data Reports - publicly available summaries of administrative billing data about how populations in each of Ontario's 60 health teams use primary care services. Given the characterization of Canadian primary care systems as 'in crisis', publicly available data about primary care at the regional level presented a significant opportunity for knowledge mobilization. An understandable resource could ground the public conversation about primary care access in data. Recognizing the role that lived experience plays in ensuring the public understands research findings, a partnership between patient advisors, Ontario Health Team representatives, researchers, and trainees was established to co-produce public-facing infographics based on primary care data.

methodsEvidence-based guidelines for public health infographic creation and elements of transformative action research guided a six-meeting process to engage up to 14 patient advisors, three Ontario Health Team staff and two primary care trainees. Patient advisors were affiliated with a provincial patient-oriented primary health care research group or a Hamilton-based Ontario Health Team. Ninety-minute meetings were conducted virtually, and notes were shared with attendees to ensure they accurately reflected the conversation. Two consultations with Ontario Health Team-affiliated primary care providers provided direction and ensured project outputs aligned with local priorities.

resultsProject partners shared feedback on draft infographics, audience identification, priority elements from Primary Care Data Reports to include in the infographics, and aesthetic features (e.g., headings, colour scheme, charts). Project partners felt the most important metrics to convey to the public were those that simultaneously reinforced the benefits of primary care on individual health outcomes and health system costs.

conclusionsPatient engagement in research is becoming widespread, but co-developing knowledge products with patient and health system partners is less common. Our approach to engaging patients prevented both oversimplification and unnecessary complexity in a public-facing visual about attachment to primary care.

Indexed as

Big dataCommunity-based participatory researchHealth communicationHealth services researchPatient and public involvementPatient engagementPatient partnerPrimary care researchPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID39497223
PMCPMC11533307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.