ArticleJournal of translational medicine2024
Implementing an intelligent diagnosis and treatment system for in-hospital cardiac arrest in the Utstein style: a multi-center case study.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Machine learning innovations in CPR: a comprehensive survey on enhanced resuscitation techniques.Artificial intelligence review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiac arrest presents a variety of causes and complexities, making it challenging to develop targeted treatment plans. Often, the original data are either inadequate or lack essential patient information. In this study, we introduce an intelligent system for diagnosing and treating in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), aimed at improving the success rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and restoring spontaneous circulation.
methodsTo compensate for insufficient or incomplete data, a hybrid mega trend diffusion method was used to generate virtual samples, enhancing system performance. The core of the system is a modified episodic deep reinforcement learning module, which facilitates the diagnosis and treatment process while improving sample efficiency. Uncertainty analysis was performed using Monte Carlo simulations, and dependencies between different parameters were assessed using regular vine copula. The system's effectiveness was evaluated using ten years of data from Utstein-style IHCA registries across seven hospitals in China's Hebei Province.
resultsThe system demonstrated improved performance compared to other models, particularly in scenarios with inadequate data or missing patient information. The average reward scores in two key stages increased by 2.3-9 and 9.9-23, respectively.
conclusionsThe intelligent diagnosis and treatment effectively addresses IHCA, providing reliable diagnosis and treatment plans in IHCA scenarios. Moreover, it can effectively induce cardiopulmonary resuscitation and restoration of spontaneous circulation processes even when original data are insufficient or basic patient information is missing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.