ArticleBMC biology2024
A powerful and versatile new fixation protocol for immunostaining and in situ hybridization that preserves delicate tissues.
Article in BMC biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiplexed gene expression analysis in dissociated and intact planarian flatworm tissues using in situ hybridization chain reaction.Biology open · 2026Article
- Extracellular vesicles mediate stem cell signaling and systemic RNAi in planarians.Science advances · 2026Article
- Metabolites produced by agat+ cells support regeneration in the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea.Developmental biology · 2026Article
- Planarian microtubules form a network within muscle and regulate injury-induced genes essential for regeneration patterning.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- A PAK family kinase and the Hippo/Yorkie pathway modulate WNT signaling to functionally integrate body axes during regeneration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Quantifying Cell Proliferation Through Immunofluorescence on Whole-Mount and Cryosectioned Regenerating Caudal Fins in African Killifish.Bio-protocol · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding how genes function to heal wounds and restore lost tissue is essential for studying regeneration. Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) is a powerful and widely used technique to visualize the expression patterns of genes in different biological systems. Yet, existing methods to permeabilize samples for WISH can damage or destroy fragile regenerating tissues, thereby preventing such experiments.
resultsHere, we describe a new protocol for in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunostaining in the highly regenerative planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. This new Nitric Acid/Formic Acid (NAFA) protocol is compatible with both the assays and prevents degradation of the epidermis and regeneration blastema. The NAFA protocol achieves this without the use of proteinase K digestion which likely leads to better preservation of antigen epitopes. We show that the NAFA protocol successfully permits development of chromogenic and fluorescent signals in situ, while preserving the anatomy of the animal. Furthermore, the immunostaining of different proteins was compatible with the NAFA protocol following fluorescent in situ hybridization. Additionally, the tissue fixation protocol was easily adapted for regenerating killifish tail fin, which yielded better ISH signal with minimal background.
conclusionsThus, the NAFA protocol robustly preserves the delicate wounded tissues while also facilitating probe and antibody penetration into internal tissues. Furthermore, the fixation protocol is compatible for WISH on regenerating teleost fins suggesting that it will be a valuable technique for studying the processes of wounding response and regeneration in multiple species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.