ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2024
Healthcare professionals' views about delivering a rehabilitation programme for individuals living with Atrial Fibrillation: a cross - sectional survey.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging the gap: examining healthcare providers' beliefs and recommendations in cardiac rehabilitation and the determinants of their practices in China.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople living with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) often experience symptoms such as irregular heartbeat, shortness of breath, and fatigue, which can significantly limit their physical activity and overall quality of life. The existing approach to managing AF predominantly revolves around medication and medical procedures, and no prescription of tailored rehabilitation program (RP) is currently offered for this population.
aimsThis study aims to gauge the perspectives of healthcare professionals regarding the implementation of a personalised RP for individuals living with AF and to identify the barriers hindering the referral process.
methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted among healthcare professionals in the UK responsible for caring for adults with AF. The survey consisted of twelve questions designed to uncover healthcare professionals' views on RP for individuals with AF.
resultsA total of 209 respondents participated in the survey, with 57% being female and 43% identifying as specialist arrhythmia nurses. A significant majority (61%) of the participants expressed agreement that an RP could help individuals with AF regain their ability to carry out daily activities, and 58% believed that RP could effectively alleviate symptoms such as breathlessness and palpitations (52%). Virtually all respondents (99%) recommended that a tailored program should encompass education about AF, weight management, and symptom control (94%). Notably, the primary factor influencing their decision to make a referral was the low physical activity levels (80%). Transportation emerged as the chief obstacle to referring patients to the program (62%). A substantial majority (79%) favoured a home-based rehabilitation program as the optimal mean of delivery.
conclusionsThe responses from healthcare professionals reflect a keen interest in implementing a program tailored to individuals with AF, with patients' low physical activity levels being the primary motivator for referrals. Home-based rehabilitation was the preferred mode of delivery, followed by digital interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.