ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024
Whole-body MRI-based long-term evaluation of pediatric NF1 patients without initial tumor burden with evidence of newly developed peripheral nerve sheath tumors.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurofibromatosis type 1-plexiform neurofibromas: Integrating treatment across pediatric and adult populations.Neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- Consensus on Malignant and Benign Tumors in Pediatric Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: On Behalf of the Brazilian Society of Pediatric Oncology (SOBOPE).Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Accounting for Biological Sex and Gender Identity in the Pathogenesis, Artistic Depictions, and Quality of Life in Neurofibromatosis Type 1.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2025Review
- Article
- Differentiation of MPNSTs from benign neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis patients using ADC and SUV biomarkers in children and young adults.Current problems in diagnostic radiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) can develop plexiform neurofibromas (PN). Large tumor burden is a predictor for the development of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) is the recommended imaging method for the evaluation of PN. WB-MRI is recommended for NF1 patients at transition from adolescence to adulthood. In the absence of internal PN further follow-up WB-MRI is not considered necessary. PN are often detected in early childhood, leading to the assumption that they may be congenital lesions. It remains unclear whether this invariably applies to all patients or whether patients who initially displayed no tumors can still develop PN over time. Therefore, we retrospectively reviewed WB-MRI scans of pediatric patients with NF1 without initial tumor burden and compared these with long-term follow-up scans for presence of newly developed PN.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed WB-MRI scans of 17 NF1-children (twelve male; median age at initial scan: 9 [IQR 6.1-11.9] years) who initially displayed no PN. MRI scans with a follow-up interval of at least 6 years (median follow-up interval: 9 [IQR 5.6-12.4] years) were reviewed in consensus by two radiologists regarding the development of new PN over time.
resultsNew PN were identified in two out of 17 children without initial tumor burden in follow-up examinations. One of these two patients developed two larger distinct PN of 4.5 cm on the right upper arm and of 2.5 cm on the left thoracic wall between the age of ten and twelve. The second child developed multiple smaller PN along the major peripheral nerves between the age of eleven and 16. In addition, 15 of the children without initial tumor burden did not develop any distinct tumors for a period of at least 6 years.
conclusionOur results indicate that PN can be newly detected in pediatric patients over time, even if no PN were detected on initial MRI scans. Therefore, it seems reasonable to perform at least a second MRI in pediatric NF1 patients at transition to adulthood, even if they did not display any tumor burden on initial MRI, and when the MRI was performed significantly under the age of 18. With this approach, tumors that may have developed between scans can be detected and patients at risk for complications can be identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.