Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39497099›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Evidence on consumers' perceptions, understanding and uses of the Nutri-Score to improve communication about its update: a qualitative study with shopping observations in France.

Marianne Cerf, Anne-Juliette Serry, Lucile Marty, Sophie Nicklaus, Pauline Ducrot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marianne CerfSanté publique France, French national public health agency, Saint- Maurice, F-94415, France.
Anne-Juliette SerrySanté publique France, French national public health agency, Saint- Maurice, F-94415, France.
Lucile MartyCentre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Institut Agro, CNRS, INRAE, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, F-21000, France.
Sophie NicklausCentre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Institut Agro, CNRS, INRAE, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, F-21000, France.
Pauline DucrotSanté publique France, French national public health agency, Saint- Maurice, F-94415, France. pauline.ducrot@santepubliquefrance.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Nutri-Score is a front-of-pack nutrition label widely used in several European countries to improve the overall quality of consumers' diets. In the view of the upcoming update of the Nutri-Score algorithm, this study evaluates consumers' perceptions, understanding and uses of this label as well as their expectations or criticisms and opinions regarding the algorithm update.

methodsTwo complementary qualitative approaches were used in 2023. Six focus group discussions with a total of 51 participants as well as 20 individual shopping observations with real purchase conditions followed by in-depth interviews were conducted among French adults. The sessions were recorded, transcribed and then analysed using a thematic approach.

resultsParticipants were familiar with the Nutri-Score but used it for food purchasing in a secondary way due to other more important criteria such as price or habits. They were aware that the label aimed to help them choose healthier products and to protect consumers. However, the lack of awareness about some aspects of the label such as the entity responsible for it or the calculation method of the score created a sense of mistrust about the Nutri-Score. Nevertheless, consumers did not report hearing criticism about the label in the media. Finally, they considered the updating of the label to be relevant.

conclusionsParticipants had a rather positive image of the Nutri-Score and its forthcoming update. Notwithstanding, to improve consumers' trust in the label, this study recommends launching an information campaign to explain its calculation method and reassure them that the Nutri-Score is a government-endorsed scheme as part of the national public health nutrition policy.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorFocus GroupsFood LabelingQualitative ResearchAdultAgedAlgorithmsCommunicationFemaleFranceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritive ValueYoung AdultFocus groupsFront-of-pack nutrition labelInformation campaignNutri-ScoreShopping observations

Identifiers

PMID39497099
PMCPMC11533413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.