ArticleBMC public health2024
Recovery environments in places of daily living: a scoping review and conceptual analysis.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations of Environmental Modifications and Collaborative Care Environments with Positive Health in Families of Children with Medical Complexity: A Secondary Analysis.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Associations Between Care Environments and Environmental Modifications in the Daily Living Settings of Children with Medical Complexity.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOwing to advances in medical technology and the promotion of at-home medical care, patients are more frequently being treated in their places of daily living after discharge from acute care hospitals. As medical care and lifestyle are closely linked, the quality of life of the patient and their families therefore depends on the adequate preparation of the recovery environment. Hence, modifying this environment to ensure that the patient's lifestyle and medical care are complementary is often vital. This study aimed to clarify the concept of recovery environments in places of daily living.
methodsThe literature search and selection of articles were based on a scoping review conducted in Scopus and PubMed, while data extraction and analysis were based on conceptual analysis. Thirty-two articles met the inclusion criteria.
resultsOur analysis of these articles allowed us to classify four types of recovery environments in places of daily living: physical environments appropriate to the health status of the recovering patient, collaborative environments in which intra-family roles are empowered, community environments in which recovering patients are accepted, and service environments in which the required services can be accessed. We also noted the main roles of medical professionals for building relationships with patients: providing decision-making support in places of daily living, creating an environment that empowers patients and their families, and modifying the service environment.
conclusionsFor patients, the main aims of recovery environments in places of daily living are to make them physically comfortable, maintain their identity, and improve their quality of life. Although this study is only a first step towards conceptualizing recovery environments in places of daily living and the final results are tentative, we are nonetheless confident that it will be important for advancing the field of home healthcare research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.