Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39497049›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical imaging2024

Computer vision applications for the detection or analysis of tuberculosis using digitised human lung tissue images - a systematic review.

Kapongo D Lumamba, Gordon Wells, Delon Naicker, Threnesan Naidoo, Adrie J C Steyn, Mandlenkosi Gwetu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kapongo D LumambaSchool of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of Kwazulu Natal (UKZN), King Edward Avenue, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg, 3209, KwaZulu Natal, Republic of South Africa. 221027473@stu.ukzn.ac.za.
Gordon Wells *Africa Health Research Institute, UKZN, 719 Umbilo Road, Durban, 10587, KwaZulu Natal, Republic of South Africa.
Delon Naicker *Africa Health Research Institute, UKZN, 719 Umbilo Road, Durban, 10587, KwaZulu Natal, Republic of South Africa.
Threnesan Naidoo *Africa Health Research Institute, UKZN, 719 Umbilo Road, Durban, 10587, KwaZulu Natal, Republic of South Africa.
Adrie J C Steyn *Africa Health Research Institute, UKZN, 719 Umbilo Road, Durban, 10587, KwaZulu Natal, Republic of South Africa.
Mandlenkosi Gwetu *Department of Industrial Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Faculty of Engineering, Banghoek Rd, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, 7600, Republic of South Africa. mgwetu@sun.ac.za.

Funding

METABOLIC REPROGRAMMING OF T CELL ENERGY METABOLISM IN TUBERCULOSIS AND HIVR61AI138280 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI STEYN, ADRIE JC · 2018 to 2019
$1.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R61 AI138280Wellcome Leap Delta Tissue Program and NIH R33/61AI138280Wellcome Strategic Core award 201433/Z/16/AWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo conduct a systematic review of the computer vision applications that detect, diagnose, or analyse tuberculosis (TB) pathology or bacilli using digitised human lung tissue images either through automatic or semi-automatic methods. We categorised the computer vision platform into four technologies: image processing, object/pattern recognition, computer graphics, and deep learning. In this paper, the focus is on image processing and deep learning (DL) applications for either 2D or 3D digitised human lung tissue images. This review is useful for establishing a common practice in TB analysis using human lung tissue as well as identifying opportunities for further research in this space. The review brings attention to the state-of-art techniques for detecting TB, with emphasis on the challenges and limitations of the current techniques. The ultimate goal is to promote the development of more efficient and accurate algorithms for the detection or analysis of TB, and raise awareness about the importance of early detection.

designWe searched five databases and Google Scholar for articles published between January 2017 and December 2022 that focus on Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection, or tuberculosis pathology using digitised human lung tissue images. Details regarding design, image processing and computer-aided techniques, deep learning models, and datasets were collected and summarised. Discussions, analysis, and comparisons of state-of-the-art methods are provided to help guide future research. Further, a brief update on the relevant techniques and their performance is provided.

resultsSeveral studies have been conducted to develop automated and AI-assisted methods for diagnosing Mtb and TB pathology from digitised human lung tissue images. Some studies presented a completely automated method of diagnosis, while other studies developed AI-assisted diagnostic methods. Low-level focus areas included the development of a novel

conclusionThe literature indicates that post 1950s, TB was predominantly studied using animal models even though no animal model reflects the full spectrum of human pulmonary TB disease and does not reproducibly transmit Mtb infection to other animals (Hunter, 2011). This explains why there are very few studies that used human lung tissue for detection or analysis of Mtb. Nonetheless, we found 10 studies that used human tissues (predominately lung) of which five studies proposed machine learning (ML) models for the detection of bacilli and the other five used CT on human lung tissue scanned ex-vivo.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLungTuberculosis, PulmonaryAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMycobacterium tuberculosisPattern Recognition, AutomatedDeep learningHuman lung tissueImage analysisTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID39497049
PMCPMC11536899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.