ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
A review of early small bowel obstructions in staged IPAA procedures.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence and pooled risk factors of stoma outlet obstruction after colorectal surgery with diverting ileostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSmall bowel obstructions (SBOs) are a common complication following staged IPAA. Our goal was to compare early post-operative SBO outcomes between different staged ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and to further analyze the type of procedures required in patients who needed operative management of SBO.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we selected all patients who presented to our tertiary care center between 2008 and 2017, with ulcerative colitis or IBD-Unspecified colitis and who underwent a primary total proctocolectomy with IPAA for medically refractory disease or dysplasia (n = 623). Patients were divided into 4 groups based on staged IPAA received (1 stage vs 2 stage vs modified 2 stage vs 3 stage). Primary outcomes were compared between both groups using univariate analysis and included SBO within 6 months post-operatively of one of the IPAA stages or 18 months since the first surgery for patients who underwent 1 or 2 stage IPAAs, and need for readmission and reoperation. Risk factors for SBO, reoperation and readmission due to SBO were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression.
resultsStage 2 and 3 patients had the highest rates of SBO post-operatively. There was a significant difference in the rate of readmission between groups, with 2 and 3 stage groups having the highest rates (p < 0.05) but the rate of SBO and reoperations was not significantly different between groups. Of all patients with an SBO, 34% required operative intervention. Of these, 65% underwent diagnostic laparoscopy with lysis of adhesions and 27% required an open procedure.
conclusionSmall bowel obstructions are a common complication of staged IPAA procedures. Patients who underwent 2 and 3 stage IPAA had the highest rates of SBO, although not statistically significant. A third of patients with an SBO required surgical intervention, with diagnostic laparoscopy and lysis of adhesions being the most common procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.