ReviewLeukemia2025
Pre-emptive therapeutic decisions based on measurable residual disease status in acute myeloid leukemia: ready for prime time?
Review in Leukemia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measurable residual disease testing in acute myeloid leukemia: current state, foundational models, and tools for future development.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Day + 30 detection of minimal residual FLT3-ITD by high-sensitivity PCR-NGS predicts relapse risk and guides post-transplant maintenance in AML.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- MRDviz: an integrated platform for interactive visualization and joint simulation of minimal residual disease trajectories and associated survival outcomes.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Consolidation cycles, measurable residual disease, and DNMT3A/ASXL1 mutations independently predict relapse-free survival in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of measurable residual disease (MRD) as a biomarker for prognostication, risk stratification, and therapeutic decision-making in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is gaining prominence. MRD monitoring for NPM1-mutated and core-binding factor AML using PCR techniques is well-established for assessing disease after intensive chemotherapy. AML with persistent FLT3-ITD MRD post-intensive chemotherapy and pre-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (pre-allo-HCT) is associated with an increased risk of relapse and lower survival. Pre-allo-HCT MRD is an independent risk factor for post-allo-HCT outcomes, including relapse and death. Therefore, preemptive interventions on the natural history of MRD positivity are an active area of research beyond its initial prognostic function. Targeting MRD in AML with innovative treatment strategies can improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39496917What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.