Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39496872›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025

The impact of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic on educational and professional growth of young Italian epileptologists: a survey of the Young Epilepsy Section-Italian chapter.

Silvia Masnada, Carlotta Spagnoli, Maddalena Duca, Daniela Chiarello, Tommaso Lo Barco, Bruna Nucera, Young Epilepsy Section—Italian chapter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Silvia MasnadaU.O.C. Neurologia Pediatrica, Buzzi Children's Hospital, 20154, Milan, Italy.
Carlotta SpagnoliS.O.C. Neuropsichiatria Infantile, Ospedale S. Maria Nuova, AUSL-IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Maddalena DucaU.O.C. Neuropsichiatria Infantile, Ospedale Civile Di Macerata, 62100, Macerata, Italy.
Daniela ChiarelloNeurology of Epilepsy and Movement Disorder Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, 00165, Rome, Italy.
Tommaso Lo BarcoEpilepsy Center, C. Poma Hospital, 46100, Mantua, Italy.
Bruna NuceraDepartment of Neurology, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Franz Tappeiner Hospital, Via Rossini, 5, 39012, Merano, Italy. bruna.nucera@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6023-5616
Young Epilepsy Section—Italian chapter

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus-related disease SARS-CoV-2 infection pandemic. Italy was one of the most affected countries and managed the emergency also by a health care reorganization.

methodsThe Education and Career Development Task Force of the Young Epilepsy Section-Italy (YES-I) designed a survey to assess the impact of the pandemic on the training and work of young epileptologists (< 40 years).

resultsFifty-three responses were collected: 45.3% were resident, 9.4% PhD students and the remainder specialists. Clinical activity changed for most (83%) during the pandemic. Educational activity at epilepsy centers was reduced for 35.8% of the survey participants, while 30.2% of research projects involving patients participation were stopped to switch mainly to COVID-19-related research. For 73.6% of survey participants, attending online courses and congresses was easier in terms of cost and organization, although for 50.9% the level of training was lower in quality. In contrast, 58.5% rated the webinars organized by YES-I very educational. Less than 50% of the clinicians used telemedicine in the pandemic period and continue to use it. Despite several positive aspects of virtual medicine, a small number (32.1%) of our interviewees were satisfied from telemedicine and few of them (30.2%) reported that it led to improvement of clinical practice.

conclusionsOur survey showed that the pandemic has had a negative impact on training, research and clinical activity in the epilepsy field; moreover, it underlined the critical aspects of virtual communication methods in order to improve its use for the future.

Indexed as

COVID-19EpilepsyAdultFemaleHumansItalyMaleNeurologistsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineItalian epileptologists; Virtual systems; Educational and professional growth

Identifiers

PMID39496872
PMCPMC11698807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.