Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Smaller is better? Compact vs. Conventional gamma camera for sentinel lymph node localization in patients with breast cancer.
Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been recognized as "the gold standard" for axillary staging in early breast cancer patients with clinically negative lymph nodes, resulting in significant morbidity decrease and quality of life improvement. This study aims to validate the performance of a newly developed handheld portable gamma camera (PGC) produced by Imagensys (Italy), in detecting and locating sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) during the preoperative and intraoperative phases in breast cancer patients compared to conventional lymphoscintigraphy.
methodsAdult female patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer, candidates for surgery and SLNB, were prospectively enrolled in this open-label, pre-marketing clinical trial. All patients underwent pre- operative assessment using both the PGC and conventional lymphoscintigraphy. The performance of the two devices was compared using the Poisson regression model for incidence rate ratios (IRRs). The intrinsic sensitivity of the devices was compared using the Wilcoxon Ranked Sign Test. The utility of PGC during intra-operative procedures was also evaluated. The manoeuvrability of the devices was evaluated using operator-satisfaction questioner.
resultsSixty-eight patients (median age 50 years, BMI 21.4) were enrolled, including two patients with bilateral breast cancer, who underwent SLNB on both axillae. The PGC demonstrated superior preoperative lymph node detection rate (IRR 8.01, 95% CI 6.11-10.50; p < 0.0001) and intrinsic device sensitivity (mean counts per second 409 ± 286 vs. 255 ± 1173 for conventional device, p = 0.0003) compared to the conventional gamma camera. Intra-operative assessment with PGC was performed in 62 patients and no additional lymph nodes were visualised. However, the conventional gamma camera demonstrated superior manoeuvrability (p < 0.0001).
conclusionThe PGC handheld gamma camera showed promising results for preoperative SLN assessment in patients with breast cancer. The limited manoeuvrability may be related to the operator's experience leading to higher inter-operator variability. Appropriate training and frequent use of nuclear medicine and surgical equipment could overcome this limitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39496868What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.