Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39496844›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Impact of different priming and sowing techniques in combination with different seed rates on wheat growth and yield.

Samiullah Khan Ranazai, Muhammad Sadiq, Muhammad Safdar Baloch, Huma Qureshi, Tauseef Anwar, Abdullah A Alarfaj, Mohammad Javed Ansari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samiullah Khan RanazaiDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan-29050, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. samikhanranazai@gmail.com.
Muhammad SadiqDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan-29050, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Muhammad Safdar BalochDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan-29050, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Huma QureshiDepartment of Botany, University of Chakwal, Chakwal, 48800, Pakistan. huma.qureshi@uoc.edu.pk.
Tauseef AnwarDepartment of Botany, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan. tauseef.anwar@iub.edu.pk.
Abdullah A AlarfajDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Javed AnsariDepartment of Botany, Hindu College (Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University, Bareilly-244001), Moradabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a staple crop of immense economic importance, especially in the agronomic context of Dera Ismail Khan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Pakistan. Understanding the effects of various agronomic practices, such as priming techniques, sowing methods, and seed rates, on wheat yield and growth is crucial for optimizing production and ensuring regional food security. To study the effects of priming and sowing techniques in combination with seed rates on short (Israr Shaheed) and long (Gomal) duration, three experiments were conducted at the agronomic research site of Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan, wheat varieties. In the first experiment, various priming techniques were used. Among different techniques used Farmyard manure priming produced the tallest plants at 111.3 and 125.3 cm, the maximum number of tillers (335.7 and 345.0 m

Indexed as

SeedsTriticumAgricultureCrop ProductionEdible GrainManurePakistanSoilManureSoilBiological yieldFarmyard manureGrain yieldIrrigation techniquesSeed rate effects

Identifiers

PMID39496844
PMCPMC11535481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.