SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024
MR-proANP levels in Acute ischemic stroke and clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent advances in stroke biomarkers - implications for prognosis and treatment.Current opinion in neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In patients with acute ischemic stroke, midregional proatrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) has shown promise in preliminary studies for risk stratification. The objective of this study is to evaluate the prognostic utility of MR-proANP in AIS, focusing on its ability to predict 90-day functional outcomes, mortality rates, and the presence of atrial fibrillation (Afib). A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, following PRISMA guidelines. The search strategy employed a combination of keywords and index terms including "Acute Ischemic Stroke," "AIS," "Cerebral Infarction," "Atrial Fibrillation," "AFib," "stroke," "MR-proANP," "Mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide," and "proatrial natriuretic peptide." Inclusion criteria encompassed any study focusing on MR-proANP and ischemic stroke, published up to October 15, 2023. Primary end points were newly diagnosed Afib, 90-day Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, and 90-day mortality. Studies were described in narrative and tabular form. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Pooled estimates for our key end points were generated using a random effects model where appropriate. MR-proANP levels were significantly elevated in newly diagnosed Afib patients compared to no Afib patients (mean difference (MD): 134.4 pmol/l; 95% confidence interval (CI): 119.45 to 149.35, P < 0.0001). Unfavorable functional outcomes, as measured by mRS scores of ≥ 3 at 90 days, were associated with higher levels of MR-proANP (MD: 93.87 pmol/; 95% CI: 76.66 to 111.09, P < 0.0001). Elevated MR-proANP levels were also strongly correlated with increased 90-day mortality rates (MD: 164.43 pmol/; CI: 95.94 to 232.92, P < 0.0001). MR-proANP was significantly associated with functional outcomes, 90-day mortality, and the newly diagnosed AF. The limited number of studies included calls for further large-scale research to confirm these findings and explore the potential for expedited diagnostic procedures and targeted interventions like anticoagulant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39496843What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.