Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39496827›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Electrotactile proprioception training improves finger control accuracy and potential mechanism is proprioceptive recalibration.

Rachen Ravichandran, James L Patton, Hangue Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachen RavichandranElectrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
James L PattonRichard and Loan Hill Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Hangue ParkElectrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. hangue.park@skku.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a novel training technique, visual + electrotactile proprioception training (visual + EP training), which provides additional proprioceptive information via tactile channel during motor training to enhance the training effectiveness. In this study, electrotactile proprioception delivers finger aperture distance information in real-time, by mapping frequency of electrical stimulation to finger aperture distance. To test the effect of visual + EP training, twenty-four healthy subjects participated in the experiment of matching finger aperture distance with distance displayed on screen. Subjects were divided to three groups: the first group received visual training and the other two groups received visual + EP training with or without a post-training test with electrotactile proprioception. Finger aperture control error was measured before and after the training (baseline, 15-min post, 24-h post). Experimental data suggest that both training methods decreased finger aperture control error at 15-min post-training. However, at 24-h post-training, the training effect was fully retained only for the subjects who received visual + EP training, while it washed out for the subjects with visual training. Distribution analyses based on Bayesian inference suggest that the most likely mechanism of this long-term retention is proprioceptive recalibration. Such applications of artificially administered sense have the potential to improve motor control accuracy in a variety of applications.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationFingersProprioceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleTouchYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39496827
PMCPMC11535408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.