ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2024
Geographical variation in osteoporosis in Australian women: a longitudinal analysis over 23 years.
Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteoporosis affects over half of older women, whether urban compared to rural residents have different risk of osteoporosis is unclear. This 23-year longitudinal study of Australian women found lower risk of osteoporosis and fractures among women living in rural compared with urban areas, which may relate to distribution of risk factors and/or screening opportunities. PURPOSE: To determine whether the prevalence of osteoporosis, fractures, and dual-X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) differs between Australian women living in rural compared with urban areas.
methodsThe Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health, a prospective longitudinal study of Australian women, includes a cohort of women born 1946-1951, surveyed nine times from 1996-2019. Data from administrative health records were linked to survey data. Geographic area was classified as major city, inner regional, outer regional, or remote. Generalised estimating equations (GEE) explored outcomes of osteoporosis, fracture, and DXA rates. Univariable and multivariable regression were performed and bootstrapping with 100 repetitions at 95% sampling of the original dataset to ensure robust results.
resultsA total of 13,712 women were included: 5000 (36.5%) living in major cities, 5214 (38.0%) inner regional, 2798 (20.41%) outer regional, and 700 (5.1%) remote areas. Baseline age, 47.6 (1.46) years (mean (SD)), was similar; but education, marital status, country of birth, smoking, BMI, and comorbidities varied between areas. Over 23 years, 2956 (21.6%) were diagnosed with osteoporosis, 3185 (23.2%) had an incident fracture, and 8151 (59.4%) had a DXA. On univariable analysis, women living outside major cities had lower risk of osteoporosis (inner regional OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.84, 0.99; outer regional 0.70; 0.63, 0.79; remote 0.43; 0.34, 0.53), and lower risk of fractures (inner regional area OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84, 0.99; outer regional 0.81; 0.73, 0.90; remote 0.54; 0.42, 0.67), than women living in major cities. These differences were no longer significant on multivariable analysis, suggesting differences might be related to the distribution of risk factors. Women living in inner regional and outer regional areas were significantly less likely to have a DXA, than those living in a major city (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.70, 0.81; OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.64, 0.77, respectively), and this remained significant on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION(S): Osteoporosis or fracture affected one-third of older Australian women, and women living outside major cities had lower rates of osteoporosis, fractures, and DXA completion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39496826What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.