ArticleScientific reports2024
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) towards Anti-VEGF treatment under one-stop intravitreal injection model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychosocial determinants of anti-VEGF treatment adherence in AMD patients: optimization of one-stop intravitreal injection service model.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitude and practice of patients and their family members regarding age-related macular degeneration: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) regarding anti-VEGF treatment within a one-stop intravitreal injection service model. A cross-sectional study was conducted from July 1, 2023, to January 31, 2024, at the One-stop Intravitreal Injection Center at Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital. Data were collected using a specially designed KAP questionnaire. The study successfully enrolled 493 participants. Of these, 214 (43.4%) were aged between 70 and 79 years, and 226 (45.8%) had been diagnosed with AMD for 1-3 years. The median knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 6.00 [3.00, 8.00] (possible range: 0-9), 42.00 [37.00, 48.00] (possible range: 11-55), and 23.00 [18.00, 27.00] (possible range: 6-30), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression for practice showed that knowledge score (OR = 1.329, P < 0.001), attitude score (OR = 1.150, P < 0.001), aged 60-69 years (OR = 0.398, P = 0.022) were independently associated with proactive practice. Mediating effect significance showed that knowledge directly affected attitude (β = 0.625), knowledge (β = 0.398) and attitude (β = 0.503) directly affected practice (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, knowledge also indirectly affected practice through attitude (β = 0.315, P < 0.001). Regarding the factors impacting their selection of anti-VEGF treatment, 63.5% of patients emphasized the crucial role of its effectiveness. Additionally, over 40% of patients considered both family circumstances and insurance coverage to be highly significant in their decision-making process. This study found that patients with AMD exhibit suboptimal knowledge yet hold positive attitudes and engage actively in practices concerning anti-VEGF treatment within a one-stop intravitreal injection service model. It is recommended that healthcare providers enhance educational interventions at intravitreal injection centers to boost patient knowledge, which is likely to further improve attitudes and proactive management practices among AMD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.