ArticleScientific reports2024
Enhanced sperm isolation via bulk acoustic waves for high-throughput motility screening.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing infertility rate has become a worrying global challenge in recent years. According to the report of the World Health Organization, the male factor is responsible for over half of infertility cases, which includes the lack of desirable characteristics in sperm motility, morphology, and DNA integrity. In recent years, it has been shown that clinical methods including density gradient centrifugation cause damage to sperm DNA and besides being invasive, they are costly and time-consuming. In contrast, microfluidics has been used as a promising and non-invasive approach to manipulate biological cells. Here, by using the microvortices created by the oscillation of the bubbles caused by the bulk acoustic waves, we were able to trap sperms with less motility. In contrast, the highly motile sperms overcame the force of the microvortices and were guided to the outlet pool by following the channel boundaries. As a result, over 50% and 44% improvement in sperm progressive motility and viability, respectively, as well as 40% improvement in DNA integrity, were observed in the analysis of sperms retrieved from the output pool. In addition to being fast and non-invasive, the proposed device benefits from an easy method for sperms retrieval and does not require any preprocessing of the raw sperm sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.