ArticleScientific reports2024
Leveraging enhanced egret swarm optimization algorithm and artificial intelligence-driven prompt strategies for portfolio selection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved Egret Swarm Optimization Algorithm Based on Variable-Factor Weighted Learning and Adjacent Generation Dimension Crossover Strategy.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multi-Strategy Improved Pied Kingfisher Optimizer for Solving Constrained Optimization Problems.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- LS-BMO-HDBSCAN as a hybrid memetic bacterial intelligence framework for efficient data clustering.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Research on bolt loosening recognition based on sound signal and GA-SVM-RFE.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advances in Zeroing Neural Networks: Bio-Inspired Structures, Performance Enhancements, and Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Hybrid weighted fuzzy production rule extraction utilizing modified harmony search and BPNN.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Large Language Models in equity markets: applications, techniques, and insights.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the financial field, constructing efficient investment portfolios is a focal point of research, encompassing asset selection and optimization of asset allocation. With the advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools have showcased capabilities never seen before. However, the black-box nature of these tools renders their outputs difficult to interpret directly, often necessitating iterative fine-tuning to align with users' expected outcomes. This study presents a structured prompt framework specifically designed for stock selection, aiming to provide direct and interpretable stock-selecting tools for investors of various levels. By creating representative scenarios and combining them into different cases for experimentation, we can explore how the construction of prompts influences the responses generated by generative AI tools. Additionally, this paper proposes a novel algorithm that combines the Nonlinear-Activated Beetle Antennae Search strategy with the Egret Swarm Optimization Algorithm (NBESOA) to address the Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection problem with Transaction Costs and Cardinality Constraints (MVPS-TCCC), utilizing real stock market data to construct portfolios based on generative AI tools recommendations. Simulation results indicate that, compared to other algorithms, NBESOA prefers optimizing portfolio configurations to achieve the highest Sharpe Ratio with the strictest constraints, bringing the outcomes closer to the portfolio's efficient frontier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.