ArticleScientific reports2024
Convolutional neural network-based classification of craniosynostosis and suture lines from multi-view cranial X-rays.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extended Reality in Neurosurgery : Surgical Planning, Navigation, Education, and Patient Communication.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Editors' Pick in May 2026.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based craniosynostosis classification via suture segmentation and mask-weighted classification.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early and precise diagnosis of craniosynostosis (CSO), which involves premature fusion of cranial sutures in infants, is crucial for effective treatment. Although computed topography offers detailed imaging, its high radiation poses risks, especially to children. Therefore, we propose a deep-learning model for CSO and suture-line classification using 2D cranial X-rays that minimises radiation-exposure risks and offers reliable diagnoses. We used data comprising 1,047 normal and 277 CSO cases from 2006 to 2023. Our approach integrates X-ray-marker removal, head-pose standardisation, skull-cropping, and fine-tuning modules for CSO and suture-line classification using convolution neural networks (CNNs). It enhances the diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of identifying CSO from X-ray images, offering a promising alternative to traditional methods. Four CNN backbones exhibited robust performance, with F1-scores exceeding 0.96 and sensitivity and specificity exceeding 0.9, proving the potential for clinical applications. Additionally, preprocessing strategies further enhanced the accuracy, demonstrating the highest F1-scores, precision, and specificity. A qualitative analysis using gradient-weighted class activation mapping illustrated the focal points of the models. Furthermore, the suture-line classification model distinguishes five suture lines with an accuracy of > 0.9. Thus, the proposed approach can significantly reduce the time and labour required for CSO diagnosis, streamlining its management in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.