ArticleScientific reports2024
Cattle identification based on multiple feature decision layer fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-Term Longitudinal Biometric Identification of Cattle Using Planum Nasolabiale Images and a Two-Stage Deep Learning Framework.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Identification of Cattle Using Nasolabial Plate Imprints and Biometric Analysis.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- Automatic cattle identification system based on color point cloud using hybrid PointNet++ Siamese network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Semi-automated annotation for video-based beef cattle behavior recognition.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhanced cattle identification using Siamese network and MobileViT with EMA attention.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In farming scenarios, cattle identification has become a key issue for the development of precision farming. In precision livestock farming, single-feature recognition methods are prone to misjudgment in complex scenarios involving multiple cattle obscuring each other during drinking and feeding. This paper proposes a decision-level identification method based on the multi-feature fusion of cattle faces, muzzle patterns, and ear tags. The method utilizes the SOLO algorithm to segment images and employs the FaceNet and PP-OCRv4 networks to extract features for the cattle's faces, muzzle patterns, and ear tags. These features are compared with the Ground truth, from which the Top 3 features are extracted. The corresponding cattle IDs of these features are then processed using One-Hot encoding to serve as the final input for the decision layer, and various ensemble strategies are used to optimize the model. The results show that using the multimodal decision fusion method makes the recognition accuracy reach 95.74%, 1.4% higher than the traditional optimal unimodal recognition accuracy. The verification rate reaches 94.72%, 10.65% higher than the traditional optimal unimodal recognition verification rate. The research results demonstrate that the multi-feature fusion recognition method has significant advantages in drinking and feeding farm environments, providing an efficient and reliable solution for precise identification and management of cattle in farms and significantly improving recognition accuracy and stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.